Grade the trade: Pistons’ pragmatism underwhelms

Brooklyn Nets forward Joe Harris (12) Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports
Brooklyn Nets forward Joe Harris (12) Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
2 of 3
Next
Detroit Pistons, Joe Harris
Brooklyn Nets forward Joe Harris (12) shoots in the first half against the Detroit Pistons Credit: Rick Osentoski-USA TODAY Sports /

Grade the trade: Pistons’ pragmatism underwhelms

Trade #1: Pistons receive Joe Harris and two second-round picks from the Nets in exchange for nothing

The Detroit Pistons were given two second-round picks to take on the $20 million expiring contracts of Joe Harris, who is still one of the league’s best pure shooters, but definitely on the downside of his career.

He does fill a need, so from that perspective he’s a nice veteran addition. They aren’t bringing him on to be a starter (which is why comparing his contract to Cam Johnson’s is asinine) and aren’t beholden to him long term.

10 worst trades in Pistons' franchise history. light. Related Story

The deal gives them a big expiring contract that could be very valuable at the trade deadline as some teams look to shed salary in a trade. The Pistons aren’t stuck paying him for very long, so it’s best to just think of Harris as a future $20 million in cap space. Whatever he provides in terms of on-the-court value is really just gravy.

So it was a pragmatic move that retains Detroit’s financial flexibility while adding a veteran who can help them.

I get that.

But it seems like Detroit should have been rewarded a little more than two second-round picks to take on $20 million, especially when the Nets were desperate to get rid of Harris and needed that money to make an offer to Cam Johnson. It seems like Detroit should at least gotten a protected first-round pick for $20 million given the situation.

So while I understand the financial pragmatism, and that he fills a need, Detroit was underpaid for the service they provided the Nets.

Grade: C-